In partnership with

A quiet takeover of the creative stack

AI wasn’t like creeping death that suddenly turned into a huge storm, it wasn’t through some single, new fandango invention either. It just seeped in unawares like black mold, a stubborn fungus growing through the cracks. Cracks created through peripherals like mastering tools, recommendation engines, stem separation, and eventually, voice models and “text-to-song” generators. Now it has metastasized, overcoming the most human working parts of the music industry: authorship, identity, and livelihood.

With a vast landscape built of platforms, frontier labs, and computer empires, the “AI titans”, sadly, aren’t marching in lockstep, and the fray among them is all about what AI is for. Disagreements on who should control it, its purpose, and can it be used to augment humanity, enhance it, or will AI just outgrow its present state on a completely different level changing the world as we know it.

1) “Abundance” vs. “Adolescence” Two rival worldviews

The narratives competing at the top levels of industry can be heard in these two terms.

One is the Abundance Thesis, which frames AI as a civilization-scale type of utility. Kind of like electricity, which is best used and incorporated in the removal of limits on human progress. Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai was famously quoted putting it into historical terms saying, “AI is… more profound than… electricity or fire.” On that same note, DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis takes that logic farther into science and medicine, making the prediction that AI could be instrumental in helping to solve disease along with many other greater challenges. He’s quoted as saying, “I think some of the biggest problems… whether that’s climate or disease, will be helped by AI solutions.”

Then there is the Adolescence Thesis, which argues that they are building, in my opinion, a beast that will be too powerful to contain or hold within current institutions, quite a scary thought. The CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, describes the moment just as precarious, like a rite of passage. He says, “Humanity is about to be handed almost unimaginable power…” For musicians looking into this debate, it is not a metaphysical one. In other words, “Abundance” sounds like wider access and availability, and cheaper creation, while “Adolescence”, well, that sounds like a tsunami of fakes, a stack of fugazi’s collapsing in on the order of things, and with that a system of protected rights that just can’t keep up.

2) The biggest ideological split, Openness vs. control

Philosophically, this is visibly the biggest conflict among the AI titans, open models vs. gated models. Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, argues the point that an open ecosystem is inherently more justified. He’s quoted as saying, “Open source will ensure that more people around the world have access… [so] power isn’t concentrated in the hands of a small number of companies…” That’s a position that resonated with many independent creators, this one included, who don’t want the future of tools locked up behind some cumbersome subscription plan and/or corporate gatekeeping.

Then there’s this issue for the labels and artists, having to deal with AI voice replication, this ‘openness’ looks more like a distribution engine setup for impersonation. With each generation in the evolutionary chain of AI capable models flooding the market, it is getting harder to prevent “style theft” from becoming the ‘go to’ default growth hack. It’s for this reason that major labels, and rights-holders have lobbied for tighter restrictions around AI machine learning, training, and usage. Major labels like Universal Music Group (UMG) have argued that streaming platforms have a duty to prevent harm stating “We have a moral and commercial responsibility to our artists to… prevent the unauthorized use of their music…”

The thing with open ecosystems is the divide between democratized creativity and democratized infringement. Sadly, they coexist. The industry has a dilemma in deciding which risk it fears most. Is it centralized control, or uncontrolled coping.

3) “Human enhancement” in plain English: what the leaders actually mean

There is a lot going on here with forked tongues and double speak, especially when tech leaders say “enhancement”. This usually means one of three things:

A) Enhancement as infrastructure (computing becomes the creative power)

Jense Huang, the CEO of NVIDIA, has framed AI as a platform shift and infrastructure build, one that will change or dictate how people interact with computers. His position is the impact will depend on broad adoption and scaling of the layers deep within the model. This translates into a practical reality for musicians where studio-grade capabilities would be embedded everywhere, like in laptops, phones, DAWs, and distribution.

B) Enhancement as scientific acceleration (AI as discovery engine)

AI as an accelerator of human knowledge, in Hassabis’ vision, will compress timelines in biology and medicine, a benefit for all. But if AI reduces the friction of creation and discovery, what would the cultural implications look like? Might we just get a world with more art and more time for life? Or maybe a world saturated with heavy competition for attention.

C) Enhancement as “truth-seeking” governance

In a world emerging with new synthetic media, Elon Musk has described X AI’s Grok as a system that is “maximally truth-seeking”. A claim that implies that the next upgrade in society will be epistemic, meaning how we verify truth, how we know things, and how we construct a shared understanding. This is some pretty deep stuff. We’re talking about a reality that will be verified synthetically through media. “Truth” becomes provenance in music, and means that what is real is the origin, ownership, what’s licensed, what permissions, and what’s consented to behind the sounds that make up a piece of music.

The Takeaway for Part 1

The AI titans aren’t just expanding their horizons on intelligence or building the tools to provide the necessary means to bring about change. They are reshaping the rules of reality and the ensuing culture that will follow. And in the music world, because of its influential power, it will be one of the first plateaus that will highlight the changes taking place where society forces a verdict. Can I get an Amen?

What do these names have in common?

• Arnold Schwarzenegger

• Codie Sanchez

• Scott Galloway

• Colin & Samir

• Shaan Puri

• Jay Shetty

They all run their businesses on beehiiv. Newsletters, websites, digital products, and more. beehiiv is the only platform you need to take your content business to the next level.

🚨Limited time offer: Get 30% off your first 3 months on beehiiv. Just use code JOIN30 at checkout.

Start building for 30% off today.

Streaming into The Void

How to Succeed as an Artist Manager

How to Succeed as an Artist Manager is a comprehensive guide for anyone who wants to pursue a career in artist management. Get the book! 

If you want to improve your playing quickly, without years of practice or you want to play smokin’ solos with intense passion and total control then this is EXACTLY what you’ve been looking for.  Click here.